Which food processor brand is more reliable? Side-by-side comparison based on 2,289 real repair records from community repair events.
Data from openrepair.org (CC BY-SA 4.0) · 6,172 total food processor records
Last updated:
Kenwood and Philips have nearly identical fix rates (54.1% vs 56.9%), so when something breaks, both brands are equally likely to be repaired successfully. Kenwood food processors tend to last longer before needing repair (16.5 years vs 11.9), suggesting better build quality or more invested owners. They break in different ways. Kenwood's most common issue is Motor (10%), while Philips mostly comes in for Physical Damage (7.2%).
If durability matters most:
Kenwood food processors tend to last longer before needing repair. Since both brands are equally repairable, the longevity advantage makes Kenwood the better long-term investment.
Based on 2,289 real repair records from community repair events. Scroll down for the full data breakdown.
Head-to-head reliability data for Kenwood vs Philips food processors, based on 2,289 community repair records. Philips leads on fix rate (56.9% vs 54.1%).
| Metric | Kenwood | Philips |
|---|---|---|
| Fix Rate | 54.1% | 56.9% |
| ValueCost per reliability point | $5.64/pt | N/A |
| Top Failure | Motor (10%) | Physical Damage (7.2%) |
| Sample Size | 1,584 | 705 |
| Avg. Age at Repair | 16.5 years | 11.9 years |
Like-for-like pricing across product tiers. Prices are approximate.
Kenwood
FDM316SS Multipro Compact+ Food Processor
No value food processor from Philips
As an Amazon Associate, Sundr earns from qualifying purchases.
Kenwood and Philips show similar reliability, with fix rates of 54.1% and 56.9% respectively, based on 2,289 community repair records.
Kenwood's top issues are motor and electrical. Philips's top issues are physical damage and motor.
Kenwood devices tend to last longer, averaging 16.5 years before first repair vs 11.9 years for Philips.
Both Kenwood and Philips show very similar durability metrics. Choose based on features, price, and specific model reviews rather than brand-level reliability alone.